In California, a compound question objection occurs when a question is posed that combines two or more distinct questions into one, making it confusing or difficult for the witness to provide a clear and coherent answer. The objection is raised because the question forces the witness to answer multiple points at once, potentially leading to an incomplete or inaccurate response. This type of question is improper because it violates the principle that a question should be simple and direct, allowing the witness to respond to each point separately.
To address this issue, the court may sustain the objection, requiring the attorney to break the question into separate, clearer parts. This ensures that the witness can give a precise answer to each question without being overwhelmed or confused. Under California Evidence Code section 766, a compound question is not allowed because it obstructs the orderly presentation of testimony and may result in unfair confusion or prejudice to the opposing party. The goal is to maintain clarity and fairness in the proceedings, ensuring that each issue is properly addressed.
