data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3694c/3694c836237cb2bb580c17891dae8519e9e9f034" alt=""
“As explained in Ault v. Dinner for Two, Inc., state court jurisdiction over the person of a defendant is dependent on satisfaction of three factors: ‘(1) jurisdiction of the state in the constitutional sense; (2) due process in the form of adequate notice and the opportunity for a hearing; and (3) compliance with the state’s statutory requirements for the service of process.'”
[California Affirmative Defenses [certain citations omitted]]